"The Nanny of Elgin"

Home Sweet Home Page
Calendar of Events
About Us
Contact Us
Testimonials
Solutions for Daily Living w/ Children
NEW VISTAS:
*Becoming a Love & Logic Parent®
*Early Childhood Parenting®
*9 Essential Classroom Skills®
*Grand Parenting©
*Day-Caring©
*Leadership Skills©
*Parenting Skills for Employees
*On-Site/In-Home Coaching
Articles
FAQ's
Love and Logic
Related Links

FORWARDED STORY Below

Visit Suburban Chicago's Information Source at www.dailyherald.com

Nanny of Elgin’ Trains for Parenting Success

Daily Herald, May 1, 2007


by Kim Mikus

When parenting, it’s better to make suggestions so the child has a sense of choice and control, according to an Elgin business owner.

An example of a choice may be, “Would you like to pick your toys up, or shall I do it? But if I do it, you may not see some of these toys again.”

Or, instead of ordering a toddler to put their shoes on, you could say, “Would you like to put on your blue or your white shoes?”

This is a basic tactic Christie Clarke teaches through her business, Out-a-Box Parenting Inc.

Clarke, a former schoolteacher, operates the business in Elgin. “No one likes to be told what to do,” she said. She added that if children learn to make good choices at an early age, they will continue to make positive decisions when they’re teenagers.

The bottom line of the philosophy that she teaches is the foundational issue of respecting others.

Clarke is often referred to as the Nanny of Elgin, based on the popular TV show that teaches parents how to discipline the family. The local entrepreneur spends time coaching in clients homes. She also holds workshops through Elgin Community College and trains teachers how to implement the philosophy in their classrooms.

Clarke was a teacher herself, most recently teaching fifth and sixth grade at Elgin Academy. It was during this time that she came up with the idea for her business.

She had a particularly difficult class and enrolled in a Love and Logic seminar in Denver. She was inspired and used the principles and implemented them in her classroom. Things changed immediately and she realized she wanted to take the program a step further.

She became a certified, independent facilitator of Jim Fay’s renowned Love and Logic program and used it to start her business.

Clarke now speaks about the program at a variety of venues including PTO meetings and other parenting functions. She is also starting a program for grandparents and teens.

“It puts the joy back into parenting,” she added.

She said the message is “embarrassingly simple.” Another key is applying logical consequences rather than punishment.

She often works with parenting groups or couples going through divorce. “We remove the stress, resolve the issues and harmonize the family,” she said.

As the mother of four children and four grandchildren, Clarke realizes that parenting is the hardest job in the world to do. “And no one is trained for it,” she added.

Clarke is now training other facilitators and has four people working for her with others waiting to be trained.

For more information, call (847) 888-8892 or check out www.outaboxparenting.com.

 

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FORWARDED STORY ABOVE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit Suburban Chicago's Information Source at www.dailyherald.com

 

After the initial period of mourning (or was that moaning) we noticed that something interesting was happening. There was considerably less bickering—and this was even before we had studies telling us of the marked increase in hostility that takes place as children attempt to reenter reality after the drug-like trance induced by television. Grades improved dramatically. I even overheard a conversation between the two youngest children in the back seat as the discussed the merits of Huckleberry Finn since they’d unearthed our collection of children’s classics and actually READ them. After we’d been told that they’d be outcasts from 4th through 8th grade society because no one would ever come spend the night again, more and more of their friends started showing up. They found doing huge puzzles or playing board games with nothing more than a bowl of popcorn and a radio was a huge draw. Comments like, “this seems more like a family than at our house,” and “I wish my dad would cut up our TV.” filtered to our delighted ears.

I’d like to say that this lasted forever and all our girls went on to win merit scholarships to prestigious universities back East. Sadly, after about six months, we gave in to the pleas to “re-splice” old Big Bertha for a hugely important 16th birthday celebration and the consequent viewing of a wildly popular video. Without our realizing it was happening, television oozed or leaked its way back into our house—though never with the position of dominance it once had. Somehow the novelty had worn off; or the addiction broken. Eventually the girls all got great educations and today are avid readers...making similarly difficult decisions about their own children’s viewing habits.

As David Anderegg, Ph.D., says in his recent book Worried All the Time,:
“...with any addictive substance, “First you take the drug, then the drug takes the drug…’ If the model of addiction propounded by Kubey and Csikszentmihalyi is true, one turns on the television because of the powerful learned but unconscious associations between TV and relaxation. Then, after it is on, the learned association between the restlessness and depression when it goes off tends to keep it on. One could certainly argue that, in a family context, family co-addition adds a powerful multiplier effect to this formula..” (p. 166)

“The most contented children I know are children who do not have television in the house at all or, if they do, have it only for use as a screen on which to watch an occasional rented movie. At a recent dinner party, a psychologist of my acquaintance was laughing about his campaign to reintroduce television into his home, in order to watch televised soccer games. His teenaged sons said, ‘Nope. Sorry, Dad. If we had it we’d want to watch it all the time—we’re much better off without it.’ These kids know themselves, and the product, well enough to know that they would be tempted if it were around, so it’s just better not to have it around at all. And for parents who worry about how to say no, how to say, ‘Turn it off,’ how to say, ‘Not tonight,’ and then hate themselves when they give in, it is by far the best solution [not to have it at all]. (ibid. 170) Next Article

Home  About us  FAQ's  Love and Logic ® Articles   Workshop
Topics
 Testimonials  Contact us